Tuesday 30 July 2013

Oprah Has Extravagant Lunch While On Safari In Africa

oprahsafari072913.jpg

What do you get for the woman who has everything?! The Serengeti of course!

Oprah and her main man Stedman Graham have been vacationing in Africa's Serengeti Plains and the media mogul has taken to Twitter and Instagram to document her amazing trip. During the safari holiday, the 59-year-old billionaire photographed cheetahs, elephants and other wild life. Oprah and Stedman, who have been going strong 27 years, also enjoyed a hot air balloon ride together, which Oprah wrote wrote about, saying, "favorite experience on Serengeti: Sunrise in Hot Air Balloon. A SuperSoulSunday moment indeed!

We don't know exactly what a "SuperSoulSunday" is but if it involves animals and a hot-air balloon ride -- we will take it!

After at the picturesque ride, Oprah had a lunch feast on the plains fit for a king -- or rather queen. Lady O posted a pic of the heavenly meal, complete with zebras prancing in the background, and wrote, "Safe landing. Gonna eat and run. Back to US, yay!"

Not a bad last meal before coming back to the US!

Oprah is no stranger to Africa -- she founded the ?Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy for Girls? in 2007, which is a boarding school for girls outside of Johannesburg in South Africa. The philanthropist has visited the school several times since it was founded.

Hey any billionaires out there want to take us on a safari? We don't eat much and we pack light!

Source: http://x17online.com/celebrities/oprah_winfrey/oprah_winfrey_lunch_safari_africa_photos_072913.php

EJ Manuel Dion Jordan Omar Borkan Al Gala kylie bisutti jimmy carter lunar eclipse Sunil Tripathi

Thursday 25 July 2013

Dell's founder boosts offer to buy the company

(AP) ? A group led by Dell's founder raised its offer for the struggling computer maker Wednesday in hopes of attracting more shareholder support for its plan to take the company private.

The 10-cent per share increase came just hours before Dell's shareholders were scheduled to vote on the previous $13.65 per share offer from Michael Dell and investment firm Silver Lake Partners.

But the extra money comes with a catch, a stipulation that the offer's fate be decided by the will of the shareholders who choose to vote in favor of the plan or against it, leaving out those who don't vote at all. Previously, non-voting shareholders were counted as opponents of the proposal.

The Round Rock, Texas, company delayed its shareholder meeting for the second time in two weeks, moving it to Aug. 2 to give the special committee of its board time to consider the offer. The meeting had been set for Wednesday, after being delayed the week before in a sign that the offer didn't have enough shareholder support.

Michael Dell and Silver Lake said Wednesday that the new offer represents their "best and final proposal" and increases the total amount they are willing to pay shareholders by about $150 million, raising the value of the proposed deal to about $24.6 billion.

The group wants to change the conditions for approval to require that a majority of the shares voted, excluding Michael Dell's stake, be in favor of the proposal. Under the current terms, the group needs a majority of all the company's outstanding shares, whether they are voted or not, excluding Michael Dell's stake, to vote in favor of it.

The group originally gave the committee until Wednesday evening to respond to the offer, but later extended it to the morning of Aug. 2, the day of the shareholder vote.

Dell's stock rose 4 cents to close at $12.91, an indication that many shareholders remain doubtful about the deal getting done, even at the sweetened price. The shares' trading volume more than quadrupled its daily average.

In their letter to Dell shareholders, Michael Dell and Silver Lake said they believe the change is "fair and reasonable" to the company's other shareholders, especially given the new offer's additional 10 cents per share for the stakeholders.

Late Wednesday morning, the group said in a statement that according to their last count about 27 percent of the company's shares, excluding Michael Dell's stake, have yet to be voted. For those shares to be treated as if they had voted against the deal is "patently unfair," the group argued. The letter didn't explain why the group accepted the current voting rules when they agreed to the deal in February.

Toward the end of the day, Michael Dell made his most direct pitch to shareholders yet in another letter that emphasized he negotiated the deal in good faith.

"The decision is now yours," Michael Dell wrote to shareholders. "I am at peace either way and I will honor your decision."

Two major Dell Inc. shareholders, billionaire Carl Icahn and investment firm Southeastern Asset Management, have been spearheading an effort to defeat the deal. They depict the proposal as an attempt by Michael Dell to seize control of the company at a sharp discount to its long-term value.

Icahn and Southeastern have offered a more complicated alternative, but they first need to block the deal with Michael Dell and then replace the company's board in a follow-up battle. In his Wednesday letter, Michael Dell said he won't support the alternative proposal, which called "destructive to the company."

The criticism came as no surprise, given the animosity between the bickering parties. Icahn has already said he believes Michael Dell should be ousted from his job, a point he reiterated on his Twitter account Wednesday.

In message to his 21,600 followers, Icahn tweeted that "all would be swell at Dell if Michael and the board bid farewell."

In an open letter to Dell shareholders released later in the day, Icahn and Southeastern accused Michael Dell and Silver Lake of trying to "gut" the proposed deal of one of its few shareholder protections.

"To change the rules at the last minute is outrageous," Icahn and Southeastern said in their letter.

Michael Dell believes he can turn around the company by spending heavily to build better tablets while also diversifying into more profitable areas of technology, such as business software, data storage and consulting. But making those changes are likely to be tumultuous and temporarily lower Dell's earnings, an upheaval that Michael Dell contends will be more tolerable if the company no longer has to answer to other shareholders.

Dell's board says it wants to sell to Michael Dell because it believes waiting for an uncertain turnaround is too risky. If the current deal unravels, analysts believe Dell's stock could plunge below $9, reverting back to its levels of late last year.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/495d344a0d10421e9baa8ee77029cfbd/Article_2013-07-24-US-Dell-Acquisition/id-b54baec38f2148fe9b8f0c874311b7b4

clint eastwood Julian Castro Blue Moon August 2012 Eddie Murphy Dead Democratic National Convention 2012 myocardial infarction What Is Labor Day

Monday 8 July 2013

Kurt Bardella: Embodiment of the GOP Brain Trust

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/vdareblog/~3/ndQqduDNXbQ/kurt-bardella-embodiment-of-the-gop-brain-trust

oh the places you ll go blunt amendment justin bieber birthday read across america vikings stadium breitbart dead db cooper

Ending Writer's Block 2 (Revenge of the Avatar) | Kevin Rogers ...

In the last post I came clean about my recent battle with writer?s block.

(I?m writing my first book based on the KLT sales messaging formula and although I know the material as well as I know my own children, I was struggling bad to get in the flow.)

Then I gave some clues about how I solved it, and you guys provided some excellent guesses.

Robert Michon really nailed it, correctly naming two things I have done in preparing to write this book ? transcribing the material from a presentation I?ve given about it, and having someone interview me about the subject.

Those are two excellent ways to get a book going? some people are able to complete entire drafts transcribing interviews or dictating into a recorder. If you pay well enough for an editor, you can even produce a quality book that way.

But, most ?dictated? books that I?ve read tend to come off a bit? fluffy.

Plus, my brain just doesn?t work that way. I?m not good at turning a mic on and dumping everything out in clean and clear passages. I need structure. And if I?m going to outline the chapters anyway, I?d prefer to be the one who fills it in with words.

After all, that?s the fun part.

Or so I thought.

In my last post I explained that I never believed in writer?s block because (as my friend and mentor John Carlton has hammered into me) it only means you need to do more research.

I blew this off because I new the material so well.

But? there?s a second half to the equation.

There?s knowing the material ? WHAT you?re writing about?

? and then there?s knowing your reader ? WHO you are writing it to.

And that?s where I was falling short. I hadn?t taken the time to really think about my reader? and create what we copywriters call ?the avatar?.

The avatar, as most of you know, is a character you create based on a person or combination of people, that represents a living, breathing human that you speak directly to as you write.

When done right, your avatar should come alive so vividly that you can see his or her eyebrows raise when you reveal something exciting and furl when you sound like you?re full of shit.

It?s an excellent way to keep your writing honest, and you?re language casual? like a good conversation over beer or coffee.

But, be honest, how often do we REALLY create avatars to this level?

I?ll ?fess up. It?s a step in the process I?ve gotten soft about.

My avatars usually get a short bio card (age, income level, product savvy, offer fatigue, likes, dislikes, desires, fears) but often get shortchanged on a name, an address and a face with real working eyebrows and crinkling foreheads.

This tends to happen when you?re up against deadlines and you?re writing to a market you?re already dialed in to.

But no excuses.

No piece of writing can be as good without a living avatar as it is when you?ve created one.

After all, how visceral can you get writing to a group of people, or worse yet a page of statistics?

Now because I?ve been teaching the KLT sales hook for over a year now, I could have easily gone into the member?s area and chosen any one of my students who have completed the course and submitted their new hook.

There are lots of great ones in here and I read every one of them.

But I wanted to start fresh with a fictional avatar that I could not only write TO, but write ABOUT, so readers of the book can have a ?live? example to follow along with.

So, I did. And then something really bizarre and alarming happened.

In the next post I?ll tell you what it was, and show you exactly how I created my avatar using simple stream of consciousness writing techniques.

For now, I?d love to hear about your experience writing to avatars. If this concept if brand new to you, how would you describe your avatar?

If you?re an advanced writer, what are some of your tricks for making avatars come to life?

Of course I?ll be reading and commenting with you.

This is the fun stuff?

Kevin

Source: http://thecopywritersedge.com/copywriting/ending-writers-block-2-revenge-of-the-avatar/

whitney houston news sylvia plath whitney houston autopsy results obama trayvon jim yong kim michael bush the host trailer

Sunday 7 July 2013

ACMT Apple Certified Mac Technicians (UK)

Soho Editors Training offer a full range of Certified training courses for Apple Final Cut Studio 3 professional applications.

Simply click on a course title below to view the course outline, course costs, see any courses already scheduled in the calendar or list format, and reserve your place now!

If you don't see the course you want to take please contact us by email: training@sohoeditorstraining.com and include a brief note about the subject you would like to train on.


Source: http://www.sohoeditors.com/course_details.asp?n=ACMT+Apple+Certified+Mac+Technicians

Arlen Specter Winsor McCay Amanda Todd washington nationals Gary Collins bus driver uppercut Alex Karras

Saturday 6 July 2013

Concern rises over Pakistan plan to halt extremism

ISLAMABAD (AP) ? Suspected Islamic militants killed at least 160 people during the new Pakistani government's first month in office, fueling concern that the country's leaders lack a coherent strategy to fight the pervasive problem of violent extremism.

The ruling Pakistan Muslim League-N party scored a resounding victory in national elections in May with a platform that promoted peace talks as the best way to quell a domestic Taliban insurgency that has killed thousands of people. The plan quickly fell apart after the Taliban withdrew their offer to talk in response to a U.S. drone strike that killed the group's deputy leader at the end of May.

The government has yet to articulate an alternate strategy, and in the meantime, the attacks keep coming.

"The government is completely confused over the terrorism problem," said Zahid Hussain, whose books plot the rise of militancy in Pakistan. "The government's indecisiveness and dithering has emboldened the militants."

At least 160 people were killed in suspected militant attacks in June, according to an Associated Press count. It was the second most deaths in a month this year, following April, when there were many attacks related to the election, said Mohammed Amir Rana, head of the Islamabad-based Pakistan Institute for Peace Studies.

Hussain and other analysts said the government failed to respond aggressively enough to the attacks over the last month. The government mostly relied on routine press releases that criticized the violence and expressed sorrow for the dead, but made no mention of who carried them out or how they would respond.

The government has taken a few public steps to show it is dealing with the attacks, which included the killing of international tourists at a scenic mountain, a suicide bombing of women university students and an attack on a funeral that killed a lawmaker.

On Tuesday, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif flew to Quetta, the capital of southwest Baluchistan province, an area where minority Shiite Muslims have been repeatedly killed by radical Sunni extremists. He brought senior security officials with him, including the head of the powerful Inter-Services Intelligence agency.

"We will give full our attention to bring an end to the lawlessness, whether it is in Quetta and Baluchistan or other parts of the country," Sharif told reporters during his trip.

Last month, Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan also traveled to Quetta following an attack there that left 24 people dead. Khan reiterated the country's support for talks with militants, although he did say that those who refuse to renounce violence will be dealt with "through other means."

Sharif has announced that he plans to hold a high-level meeting with political party leaders on July 12 to discuss a national strategy to curb militancy.

Analysts said Sharif's trip to Quetta was a good step, but it's the follow-through that matters. They warned that the government's attempts to form a consensus will likely founder. Islamist parties will likely blame the problem of militancy on CIA drone strikes and the U.S.-led war in neighboring Afghanistan, and no action will be taken, said Talat Masood, a retired Pakistani army general and defense analyst.

"There's no point in them repeating the same thing that has been said that 'We will get everyone together and then formulate a policy.' The people have voted," he said. "That's fine if you want to take along as many political parties, but essentially the responsibility is yours."

Interior Ministry spokesman Omar Hameed Khan defended the government, saying officials were committed to coming up with a national security strategy within three or four months in consultation with all stakeholders, including the military.

To be fair, the government has had its hands full dealing with an issue that is arguably more important than militancy for most Pakistanis ? fixing the country's crippling electricity shortages. That was the issue that propelled the new government to victory, even more so than its promise to negotiate an end to militant attacks, and failure to quickly turn the lights back on could translate into a short term for the new government.

The government has also negotiated a bailout from the International Monetary Fund and presented a new budget to parliament.

Critics say even with those other concerns, the government should take a stronger line on militancy.

"Even if they are devoted to other issues, terrorism is still the most serious issue because it undermines the credibility of the state and shatters the confidence of ordinary people in the capacity of the state to protect them," said Hasan Askari Rizvi, a Pakistani political analyst.

Neither Sharif nor the interior minister has gone to the troubled city of Peshawar in northwest Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province on a similar security-related trip, although it, too, has been hard hit by bombings and shootings. Analysts say that is partly because the killing of Shiite Muslims in Baluchistan has become such a high-profile issue that it can't be ignored. But visiting Khyber Pakhtunkhwa is also fraught with more political risks since it's controlled by Sharif's rival, cricket star-turned-politician, Imran Khan.

Khan's party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, is even more vocal in its support for negotiations instead of military operations as a way to end terror attacks. While the federal government's stance over the last month has been defined mostly by silence on the militancy issue, PTI officials have consistently pushed their negotiations agenda in the face of repeated bombings in the province.

"There is no other way," said Shaukat Ali Yousafzai, a member of Khan's party who serves as provincial spokesman. "We have been fighting for the last 10 years against these people, and terrorism activities are increasing day by day."

Critics say promoting peace talks ignores the Pakistani Taliban's history of using such negotiations as a way to gain time to consolidate their strength. And they question whether the government should negotiate with a group of militants dedicated to overthrowing the Pakistani state and enforcing hard-line Islamic law.

Analysts say the Sharif government may be wary about launching a broad crackdown on militancy because it could trigger blowback in the ruling party's home province of Punjab, which has suffered relatively few attacks. It could also alienate Islamists among the party's supporters.

At the end of the day, the new government is likely finding that solving Pakistan's militancy problem is one of the most complicated challenges it faces.

"There is a hell of difference between being in government and sitting out and criticizing," said Mian Iftikhar Hussain. He should know. He's a member of the Awami National Party, which supported military operations against the militants and was voted out of office in May. He also lost his only son to Taliban gunmen.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/concern-rises-over-pakistan-plan-halt-extremism-063152035.html

multiple sclerosis rodney king Webb Simpson Fathers Day Quotes Stevie J mothers day 2012 osama bin laden death